Development and validation of a novel home-made bench-top training model for retrograde intrarenal surgery.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a low-cost homemade bench-top training model to facilitate retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) training. METHODS: The RIRS training model (G-Model) was developed using a surgical glove and a recycled ureter access sheath. Fifteen participants including 10 residents and 5 urologists were enrolled. Designed training curriculum for residents was carried out. Face validity, content validity, construct validity and criterion validity evaluation of the G-Model were carried out. RESULTS: The global score of face and content validity was 4.15 ± 0.53 and 4.65 ± 0.29, respectively. For construct validity, the overall modified global rating scale (mGRS) score was significantly improved [12.5 (5.25) vs. 24.0 (5.25), p = 0.004], and the total task time was significantly shortened (39.5 ± 4.48 min vs. 24.1 ± 3.81 min, p < 0.001) within residents after G-Model training. The baseline mGRS score and total task time of residents were poorer than those of urologists [12.5 (5.25) vs. 32.0 (1.00), p < 0.001; 39.5 ± 4.48 min vs. 16.0 ± 1.58 min, p < 0.001]. Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong correlations between residents' G-Model and real patient performance. CONCLUSION: The current study presented a valid low-cost easily accessible RIRS bench-top training model which could facilitate skill acquisition and translate to real-life scenario.

Three Dimensional Printing Technology Used to Create a High-Fidelity Ureteroscopy Simulator: Development and Validity Assessment (Rein-3D-Print-UroCCR-39).

OBJECTIVE: To create and assess the validity of a high-fidelity, three dimensional (3D) printed, flexible ureteroscopy simulator resulting from a real case. METHODS: A patient's CT scan was segmented to obtain a 3D model in .stl format, including the urinary bladder, ureter and renal cavities. The file was printed and a kidney stone was introduced into the cavities. The simulated surgery consisted of monobloc stone extraction. Nineteen participants split into 3 groups according to their level (6 medical students, 7 residents and 6 urology fellows) performed the procedure twice at a 1-month interval. They were rated according to a global score and a task-specific score, based on an anonymized, timed video recording. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated a significant improvement between the 2 assessments, both on the global score (29.4 vs 21.9 points out of 35; P < .001) and the task-specific score (17.7 vs 14.7 points out of 20; P < .001) as well as procedure time (498.5 vs 700 seconds; P = .001). Medical students showed the greatest progress for the global score (+15.5 points (mean), P = .001) and the task-specific score (+6.5 points (mean), P < .001). 69.2% of participants considered the model as visually quite realistic or highly realistic and all of them judged it quite or extremely interesting for intern training purposes. CONCLUSION: Our 3D printed ureteroscopy simulator was able to enhance the progress of medical students who are new to endoscopy, whilst being valid and reasonably priced. It could become part of a training program in urology, in line with the latest recommendations for surgical education.

Modelo impreso en 3D para entrenamiento en ureteroscopia flexible, una opción de bajo coste para el entrenamiento quirúrgico / 3D printed model for flexible ureteroscopy training, a low-cost option for surgical training

Introducción La práctica en modelos experimentales es una opción válida que mejora los resultados y acorta las curvas de aprendizaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas.Nuestro objetivo fue desarrollar un modelo en plástico, impreso en 3D para la docencia, el entrenamiento y la formación en ureteroscopia flexible, analizando costes e idoneidad para la práctica de esta técnica quirúrgica.Métodos Se elaboró un modelo impreso en 3D a partir de una tomografía axial computarizada de una vía urinaria superior de un paciente real. La segmentación se llevó a cabo mediante el software HorosTM y la impresión mediante una impresora FDM-Ultimaker.Se numeró los cálices renales para ser identificados, como en el plan de formación de tratamiento endoscópico de litiasis, ejercicio 4, de la Asociación Europea de Urología.Se utilizaron: un ureteroscopio flexible desechable Innovex (Palex) y cestillas de nitinol (Coloplast).Resultados El tiempo de impresión fue de 19h, con un coste total de 8,77€.El modelo tridimensional permitió la introducción del ureteroscopio flexible y la exploración de los cálices renales por parte de urólogos tanto en formación como en ejercicio actual de la especialidad sin dificultad.El modelo también permitió la utilización de cestillas y la movilización y extracción de litiasis previamente colocadas.Conclusión Damos a conocer un modelo tridimensional válido para ejercicios de formación en ureteroscopia flexible con unos costes razonables, que permitirá adquirir la destreza y la confianza necesaria para iniciar el procedimiento en un escenario real (AU)

Introduction Training in experimental models is a valid option that improves the outcomes and shortens surgical learning curves.Our objective was to develop a 3D printed plastic model for teaching, training and education in flexible ureteroscopy, analyzing costs and suitability for the practice of this surgical technique.Methods A 3D printed model was developed based on a CT scan from a real-life patient's upper urinary tract. HorosTM software was used for segmentation and an FDM-Ultimaker for 3D printing.Renal calyces were numbered to be identified, as in the European Association of Urology Endoscopic Stone Treatment training curriculum, Task 4.The following were used: Innovex single-use flexible ureteroscope (Palex) and nitinol baskets (Coloplast).Results Printing time was 19hours, with a total cost of €8.77.The three-dimensional model allowed the insertion of the flexible ureteroscope and the exploration of the renal calyces by urologists in training as well as in current practice of the specialty without difficulty.The model also allowed the use of baskets and the mobilization and removal of previously placed stones.Conclusion We unveil a valid three-dimensional model for flexible ureteroscopy training exercises with reasonable costs, which will allow acquiring the necessary skills and confidence to initiate the procedure in a real-life scenario (AU)

Are there predictors of flexible ureteroscopic aptitude among novice trainees? objective assessment using simulation-based trainer.

PURPOSE: Non-surgical skills involving hand-eye coordination and bimanual dexterity may have a transferable impact on the acquisition of ureteroscopy skills. In this study, we aim to investigate the predictors of initial flexible ureteroscopy skills among novice trainees. METHODS: This was a prospective study involving students with no prior ureteroscopy exposure. Non-surgical parameters were assessed with a detailed survey, including demographics, video game, and musical history. Musical ability was objectively evaluated with the mini-Profile of Music Perception Skills test. Ureteroscopic performance was evaluated using a Boston Scientific© flexible ureteroscope on a bench model. Each participant completed diagnostic ureteroscopy and stone extraction. Outcomes included both speed and quality of performance, based on an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills rubric. RESULTS: A total of 28 pre-clerkship medical students and 10 urology residents were included. Age and musical background were not associated with ureteroscopic aptitude. Those with video game history tended to perform ureteroscopy tasks faster with a higher OSATS score, although no statistical significance was reached. Male gender was associated with faster task completion with statistically higher OSATS score independent of video game activities (p = 0.011), however, the absolute score difference was small. CONCLUSIONS: Among novice trainees, musical and video game experience was not predictive of ureteroscopy skills. Male gender was associated with slightly faster and higher ureteroscopy technique scores, however, the differences are small and unlikely to represent clinical significance. Nevertheless, the use of ureteroscopy trainer provides useful insights and should be adopted in training programs as a marker of skills progression.

The SIMULATE ureteroscopy training curriculum: educational value and transfer of skills.

OBJECTIVE: Different simulation modalities may be utilised in a curricular fashion to benefit from the strengths of each training model. The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel multi-modality ureterorenoscopy (URS) simulation curriculum in terms of educational value, content validity, transfer of skills and inter-rater reliability. METHODS: This international prospective study recruited urology residents (n = 46) with ≤ 10 URS experience and no prior simulation training. Participants were guided through each phase of the expert-developed SIMULATE URS curriculum by trainers and followed-up in the operating room (OR). Video recordings were obtained during training. A post-training evaluation survey was distributed to evaluate content validity and educational value, using descriptive statistics. Performance was evaluated using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) scale to measure improvement in scores throughout the curriculum. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa tests were utilised to investigate correlation and agreement between raters. RESULTS: Participants reported gaining OR-transferrable skills (Mean: 4.33 ± 0.67) and demonstrated marked improvement in throughout the curriculum, transferred to the OR for both semi-rigid URS (p = 0.004) and flexible URS (p = 0.007). 70% of participants were successfully followed-up in the OR (n = 32). No differences were identified with the additional use of fresh frozen cadavers (p = 0.85, p = 0.90) and the URO Mentor VR simulator (p = 0.13, p = 0.22). A moderate level of correlation was noted on the video OSATS assessments, between two expert assessors (r = 0.70), but a poor agreement with the live rating. CONCLUSION: The SIMULATE URS training curriculum received high educational value from participants, who demonstrated statistically significant improvement with consecutive cases throughout the curriculum and transferability of skills to the OR in both semi-rigid and flexible URS.

Operator-assisted vs self-achieved basketing during ureteroscopy: results from an in vitro preference study.

OBJECTIVES: A recently introduced device (LithoVue Empower™ or LE, Boston Scientifics, USA) allows the surgeon to directly control the stone-retrieving basket without the need of an assistant during flexible ureteroscopy. We aimed to evaluate the stone-retrieval performance of this device. METHODS: We used a bench-training model for flexible ureteroscopy, the Key-box (K-Box®, Porgès-Coloplast, France), to compare the LE configured with a 1.9F stone-retrieval tipless basket (ZeroTip™, Boston Scientific, USA) and a traditional assistant-maneuvered 1.9F stone-retrieval tipless basket. Seven experienced endo-urologists and seven residents-in-training retrieved a fake stone from three different renal cavities of the K-Box with increasing access complexity first with the traditional basket and then with the LE device. We recorded retrieval time and all the operators filled in the NASA Task Load Index (TLI) for the self-evaluation of their performance. We then compared the use of LE in terms of retrieval time, failure rates, and NASA-TLI scores. RESULTS: Stone retrieval times and failure rates were similar according to the retrieval technique, although residents had non-statistically significant shorter times with the LE. NASA-TLI scores revealed lower frustration (p = 0.03) when LE was used by experienced urologists as compared to the traditional basketing. When stratifying the analyses according to surgical experience, fully trained urologists performed faster stone retrieval and showed lower effort scores than residents-in-training (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The individually controlled retrieval system is an effective device assisting stone retrieval and does not necessitate specific training among experienced endo-urologists. Young residents might benefit from LE during their learning curve.

Validación de un modelo simulado inanimado basado en impresión 3D de ureterorrenoscopía flexible / Validation of an inanimate simulated model based on flexible ureterorenoscopy 3D printing

Resumen Objetivo: Establecer validez aparente, de contenido y constructo, de un programa de simulación de ureterorrenoscopía flexible. Materiales y Método: Se desarrolló un modelo de simulación de silicona para ureterorrenoscopía flexible, en el cual se establecieron 8 marcas de colores en los distintos cálices. Para la validación, se reclutaron urólogos expertos y residentes de urología con experiencia variable en este procedimiento. Se separaron en 3 grupos: G1 para residentes sin experiencia en ureteroscopía, G2 para residentes con experiencia variable y G3 para urólogos expertos. Se les solicitó realizar una navegación completa del modelo, en un tiempo máximo de 600 segundos. Al finalizar, cada participante contestó una encuesta respecto a la utilidad y realismo del modelo. Además, se midió tiempo total, número de puntos encontrados y cantidad de veces de reingreso a los cálices para validación de constructo. Resultados: 15 personas participaron en la evaluación. Se obtuvo una mediana de 8,6 puntos para la utilidad del modelo y 6,75 puntos para el realismo de este. Los tiempos totales de navegación fueron 504, 293 y 133 segundos para G1, G2 y G3 respectivamente (p = 0,02). De las 8 marcas, se encontraron en promedio 5,1, 6,6 y 7,3 (p = 0,18), presentando un promedio de 9,5, 3,8 y 1,3 reintentos de exploración de los cálices en los respectivos grupos (p = 0,11). Conclusiones: Se establece validez aparente y contenido para un modelo de ureterorrenoscopía flexible. El programa de simulación de ureterorrenoscopía flexible establecido, permite diferenciar novatos de expertos en cuanto a reducción en los tiempos de navegación.

Aim: To establish the face, content, and construction validity of a flexible ureterorenoscopy simulation program. Materials and Method: A simulation model for flexible ureterorenoscopy was developed using silicone on which eight colored marks were marked on the calyxes. For validation, expert urologists and residents with varying amounts of experience in this procedure were recruited. They were separated into three groups: 1) G1 for residents without experience in ureteroscopy; 2) G2 for residents with variable experience; and 3) G3 for expert urologists. They were asked to perform a full navigation of the model in a maximum time of 600 sec. At the end, each participant answered a survey regarding the usefulness and realistic nature of the model. In addition, total time, number of marks found, and times of re-entry to the calyxes were measured. Results: A median of 8.6 points was obtained for the utility of the model and 6.75 points for its realistic nature. The total navigation times were 504, 293, and 133 seconds for G1, G2, and G3, respectively (p = 0.02). Of the eight marks, an average of 5.1, 6.6, and 7.3, (p = 0.18) were found with an average of 9.5, 3.8, and 1.3 exploration reattempts at the chalices in the corresponding groups (p = 0.11). Conclusions: Face and content validity was established for this simulation model of flexible ureterorenoscopy. This flexible ureterorenoscopy simulation program allowed us to differentiate the level of expertise in terms of reduction in navigation time.

A global snapshot of endourology residency training.

BACKGROUND: Urology has become more complex over the last decades with surgical sophisticated technologies such as endoscopy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery. As these minimally invasive methods gain popularity throughout the world, this has led in some countries to a serious training gap as compared to other countries, and between generations of surgeons within national training systems. There is a huge heterogeneity in urological training between countries, whether developed or developing. This paper attempts to shed some light onto global urological training, comparing a significant number of various national systems, and to outline global tendencies in urological training. It will enable interested readers to see where their own system stands in international comparison, and hopefully enable them to identify training needs to achieve global quality standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a questionnaire-based assessment which was sent to 240 members of U-merge from 62 countries. In addition, there is ample literature on the requirements of structured training programs and assessments, and we have tried to briefly outline the key points in this paper. RESULTS: We received responses from 32 countries Urology residency training is hugely heterogenous between countries. Only 44% of nations use a structured training program with assessments. Others use the Halstedian apprenticeship approach. Notably, some developing countries do use modern teaching and assessment methods, whereas some developed countries still use the outmoded apprenticeship model. For the interested reader, results have been tabled in detail, and training systems described country by country. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown a huge heterogeneity in quality urology training between countries and within continents. In systems without national structure of training, it can be assumed that such differences exist even between hospitals/ training institutions. There is no doubt in times of globalization with resident and doctor migration and exchanges that training needs structure and standardization. The still huge gap in developing countries to catch up and be able to afford latest surgical and learning technologies need to be addressed with the help of responsible outreach programs.

The effect of repeated full immersion simulation training in ureterorenoscopy on mental workload of novice operators.

BACKGROUND: Difficult surgical procedures may result in a higher mental workload, leading to increased fatigue and subsequent errors. This study was aimed to investigate the effect of repeated simulation training in ureterorenoscopy in a high-fidelity setting on the performance and mental workload of novice operators. METHODS: Medical students voluntarily participated in the present simulation study. After a didactic and video-based lecture, they underwent simulation training involving a renal stone case, including a rigid cystoscope component (task 1, performing a WHO checklist, assembling a scope, and insertion of a guide-wire and an access sheath after examining the bladder) and a flexible ureterorenoscope component (task 2, retrieving a stone located in the upper calyx using a basket after inspecting the upper, middle, and lower calyx). Training was performed in a mock operating theater. Technical skills were assessed by one author (an experienced urologist) onsite using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score at each training session. The mental workload was subjectively evaluated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire after each training session. RESULTS: Seventeen students completed a minimum of 6 training sessions (male: female = 10: 7, median age of 22) over a median of 21 days (range, 10-32). In both tasks 1 and 2, the OSATS score improved over the 6 sessions with evidence of plateauing (MANOVA model, task 1: p < 0.0001, task 2: p < 0.0001). In contrast, the NASA-TLX score persistently decreased without plateauing (task 1: p = 0.0005, task 2: p = 0.0028). CONCLUSIONS: Under repeated simulation training in ureterorenoscopy in a high-fidelity setting, participants showed a continual decrease of the mental workload, while the improvement of technical skills reached a plateau over the 6 sessions. Our study showed the important benefit of simulation training to reduce the mental workload by repeated scenario training before actual clinical practice.

[The basis of endoscopic stones recognition, a prospective monocentric study]. / Base pédagogique de la reconnaissance endoscopique des calculs, étude prospective monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate by junior urologists the morphology of urinary stone using visual endoscopic recognition after expert teaching. Material From December 2017 to May 2018, surface and section stone pictures extracted from digital ureteroscopy had been submitted to description and recognition. Participants could take benefit from an expert coaching. Each stone was evaluated by a different coherence questionnaire (score 1-5). RESULTS: Nine stones had been analyzed by 15 junior urologists. Mean score was initially 1.94/4 and then from 2.07 to 4.07/5 during the study. A perfect stone recognition and a matching etiological lithiasis research had been observed in 40.7% and 55.6% of cases respectively. CONCLUSION: This first teaching experience of the urinary stone morphological endoscopic typing confirms the possibility to train urologists to gain this specific initial skill. Thereby, they could play a more important role in the etiological and diagnostic lithiasis research.

The European Urology Residents Education Programme Hands-on Training Format: 4 Years of Hands-on Training Improvements from the European School of Urology.

BACKGROUND: The European School of Urology (ESU) started the European Urology Residents Education Programme (EUREP) in 2003 for final year urology residents, with hands-on training (HOT) added later in 2007. OBJECTIVE: To assess the geographical reach of EUREP, trainee demographics, and individual quality feedback in relation to annual methodology improvements in HOT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 2014 to October 2017 (four EUREP courses) several new features have been applied to the HOT format of the EUREP course: 1:1 training sessions (2015), fixed 60-min time slots (2016), and standardised teaching methodology (2017). The resulting EUREP HOT format was verified by collecting and prospectively analysing the following data: total number of participants attending different HOT courses; participants' age; country of origin; and feedback obtained annually. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 796 participants from 54 countries participated in 1450 HOT sessions over the last 4 yr. This included 294 (20%) ureteroscopy (URS) sessions, 237 (16.5%) transurethral resection (TUR) sessions, 840 (58%) basic laparoscopic sessions, and 79 (5.5%) intermediate laparoscopic sessions. While 712 residents (89%) were from Europe, 84 (11%) were from non-European nations. Of the European residents, most came from Italy (16%), Germany (15%), Spain (15%), and Romania (8%). Feedback for the basic laparoscopic session showed a constant improvement in scores over the last 4 yr, with the highest scores achieved last year. This included feedback on improvements in tutor rating (p=0.017), organisation (p<0.001), and personal experience with EUREP (p<0.001). Limitations lie in the difficulties associated with the use of an advanced training curriculum with wet laboratory or cadaveric courses in this format, although these could be performed in other training centres in conjunction with EUREP. CONCLUSIONS: The EUREP trainee demographics show that the purpose of the course is being achieved, with excellent feedback reported. While European trainees dominate the demographics, participation from a number of non-European countries suggests continued ESU collaboration with other national societies and wider dissemination of simulation training worldwide. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper we look at methodological improvements and feedback for the European Urology Residents Education Programme hands-on-training over the last 4 yr.

Crowdsourced Assessment of Ureteroscopy with Laser Lithotripsy Video Feed Does Not Correlate with Trainee Experience.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate the use of crowdsourced surgical video assessment in the evaluation of urology residents performing flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. METHODS: We collected video feeds from 30 intrarenal ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy cases where residents, postgraduate year (PGY) two through six, handled the ureteroscope. The video feeds were annotated to represent overall performance and to contain parts of the procedure being scored. Videos were submitted to a commercially available surgical video evaluation platform (Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills). We used a validated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy global assessment tool that was modified to include only those domains that could be evaluated on the captured video. Videos were evaluated by crowd workers recruited using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform as well as five endourology-trained experts. Mean scores were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for the expert domain and total scores. ICCs were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated as a measure of the strength of the relationships between the crowd mean and expert average scores. RESULTS: A total of 30 videos were reviewed 2488 times by 487 crowd workers and five expert endourologists. ICCs between expert raters were all below accepted levels of correlation (0.30), with the overall score having an ICC of <0.001. For individual domains, the crowd scores did not correlate with expert scores, except for the stone retrieval domain (0.60 p = 0.015). In addition, crowdsourced scores had a negative correlation with the PGY level (0.44, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: There is poor agreement between experts and poor correlation between expert and crowd scores when evaluating video feeds of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. The use of an intraoperative video of ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for assessment of resident trainee skills does not appear reliable. This is further supported by the lack of correlation between crowd scores and advancing PGY level.

Evaluation of Optimal Timing of Expert Feedback in a Simulated Flexible Ureteroscopy Course.

Introduction: Simulation-based training (SBT) has become an increasingly popular modality to train novice surgical residents in the face of rapidly increasing innovative surgical techniques across all surgical disciplines. Recent studies have already demonstrated SBT to be effective in helping overcome the learning curve associated with new surgical techniques, especially in junior residents and endoscopic procedures. In addition, it is known that trainees benefit significantly from expert feedback; however, there is a paucity of data looking into the optimal timing of this feedback during SBT. To address this knowledge deficit, an SBT curriculum was developed for junior urology residents to assess optimal timing of feedback during SBT for flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). Materials and Methods: The SBT course consisted of a pretraining assessment, three independent practice sessions, and a post-training assessment, with residents receiving expert feedback right after their pretraining assessment (early feedback [EF]) or after their final independent training session (late feedback [LF]). Results: Fifteen trainees with similar baseline fURS experience and precourse fURS task performance score participated in the study. There was a significant difference between the pre- and post-task completion times overall (15.2 minutes vs 9.1 minutes, p < 0.001), with no difference between the early or LF groups (p = 0.884). The mean performance scores improved for both groups (18.2 vs 24.2, p < 0.001) with the EF group having a more statistically significant improvement in performance scores than the LF group (p = 0.05), and most (73%) of residents preferred EF. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that an SBT curriculum for fURS is effective for technical skills development among junior trainees, and that EF resulted in marginally better overall scores and was preferred by residents.

Contemporary practice patterns in the treatment of pediatric stone disease.

INTRODUCTION: To compare endourology versus pediatric urology exposure to pediatric stone cases during fellowship, comfortability in treating pediatric stone cases, and access to pediatric surgical equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to all pediatric urology fellowship programs and the Endourological Society. Age was stratified into < 12 months old, 12 months-4 years, 5-12 years, and 13-18 years. Exposure and comfortability performing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were assessed across age groups. Exposure was assessed as 'yes/no' and comfortability was scaled from 1-5 ('would not do' to 'very comfortable'). RESULTS: Seventy-two surveys met inclusion criteria, with 23 (31.9%) from pediatric urologists and 49 (68.1%) by endourologists. During fellowship, pediatric urologists had more exposure to SWL in toddlers (p = 0.03) and school age children (p = 0.045), URS in toddlers (p = 0.012) and school age children (p = 0.002), and PCNL in infants (p = 0.031) and school age children (p = 0.025) compared to endourologists. Pediatric urologists were significantly more comfortable performing SWL in toddlers (p = 0.04), URS in toddlers (p = 0.04) and school age children (p = 0.04), and PCNL in school age children (p = 0.02) compared to endourologists. Endourologists were significantly more uncomfortable than pediatric urologists in performing URS in toddlers (p = 0.03) and PCNL in infants (p = 0.04) and school age children (p = 0.03). There were no differences in availability of pediatric equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric urologists, have significantly more exposure than endourologists during fellowship and are more comfortable performing surgical treatment for urolithiasis in most pediatric ages. Endourology fellowships may benefit from greater exposure to pediatric patients with stones.

A Randomized Trial Comparing The Learning Curve of 3 Endoscopic Enucleation Techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH Using Mentoring Approach-Initial Results.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in the learning curve associated with different techniques of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups (30 patients in each): HoLEP, ThuFLEP or MEP. Inclusion criteria for the study included prostate volume <80 cc, IPSS > 20, or Qmax < 10. The EEPs were performed by 3 surgeons experienced in transurethral resection of the prostate. Assignment of surgeons to surgical technique was also randomized. None of the surgeons had prior experience in EEP. RESULTS: ThuFLEP was slightly superior (with no significant difference [P > .05]) to HoLEP and MEP in terms of overall enucleation rate-1.0 g/min vs 0.8 g/min and 0.7 g/min, respectively. We observed similar enucleation rates at the initial stages of training (first 20 surgeries) with insignificant increase in ThuFLEP efficiency. At next 10 surgeries ThuFLEP and HoLEP efficiency were higher than of MEP (P < .001) without significant difference between techniques of laser EEP (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate can be adopted safely and effectively within 30 surgeries if the technique is learned with a mentoring approach. EEP is shown to be safe and effective even in the initial stages of learning. Laser EEP (HoLEP, ThuFLEP) appears to lend itself to quicker adaptation compared MEP.

[Result of treatment of urinary lithiasis for professional aptitude]. / Traitement de la lithiase urinaire pour aptitude professionnelle : résultats de la prise en charge par urétéroscopie dans une population militaire.

INTRODUCTION: Military people are inapt for presence of urinary stones. In this specific population, the treatment of stones is even more aggressive than for the general population without recommendation. The final decision about aptitude is the responsibility of the military doctor. Whereas, ureteroscopy has its place there and must done by any urologist. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to estimate the results of treatments by ureteroscopy in this population. Success was defined by the complete absence of fragment visualized in the imaging of control operating comment and so the end of the inaptitude time. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2016, forty-two were treated for ureteral or renal calculi. The population comprises of 93% men, 35 years old on average. The stones were mainly multiple (more 2) and the medium size is 5mm; sixteen (42.9%) was at the left and eight (19%) was bilateral. In 78.8% (78) of the cases there was a stone in renal position whose 50% (39) still at the lower calyx. In total, 5% of the patients were stone-free in 2 sessions on average. The average deadline of inaptitude of the initial consultation in the resumption of work was of 6 months. In 4% of the cases there was a complication operating rank 4. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility, the weak harmlessness of ureteroscopy and the lesser deadline of inaptitude. Every urologist can treat this specific population. The patient must be informed and accept the treatment because of excluding referential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The role of cognitive training in endourology: a randomised controlled trial. / El papel de la formación cognitiva en la endourología: un ensayo controlado aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive training is an important training modality which allows the user to rehearse a procedure without physically carrying it out. This has led to recent interests to incorporate cognitive training within surgical education but research is currently limited. The use of cognitive training in surgery is not clear-cut and so this study aimed to determine whether, relative to a control condition, the use of cognitive training improves technical surgical skills on a ureteroscopy simulator, and if so whether one cognitive training method is superior. METHODS: This prospective, comparative study recruited 59 medical students and randomised them to one of three groups: control- simulation training only (n=20), flashcards cognitive training group (n=20) or mental imagery cognitive training group (n=19). All participants completed three tasks at baseline on the URO Mentor simulator followed by the cognitive intervention if randomised to receive it. Participants then returned to perform an assessment task on the simulator. Outcome measures from the URO Mentor performance report was used for analysis and a quantitative survey was given to all participants to assess usefulness of training received. RESULTS: This study showed cognitive training to have minimal effects on technical skills of participants. The mental imagery group had fewer laser misfires in the assessment task when compared to both control and flashcards group (P=.017, P=.036, respectively). The flashcards group rated their preparation to be most useful when compared to control (P=.0125). Other parameters analysed between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Cognitive training was found to be feasible and cost effective when carried out in addition to simulation training. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that the role of cognitive training within acquisition of surgical skills is minimal and that no form of cognitive training was superior to another. Further research needs to be done to evaluate other ways of performing cognitive training.

European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Consensus Statement on Simulation, Training, and Assessment in Urolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training offers an acceptable adjunct to the traditional mentor-apprentice model in helping trainees to traverse the early stages of the learning curve for ureteroscopy and percutaneous renal surgery. In addition, nontechnical skills are increasingly important in preventing adverse events in the operating room, and simulation-based training can be used for training in such skills. Incorporation of simulation into formalised, standardised, and validated curricula offers an applicable method for training residents. OBJECTIVE: To develop a curriculum for urolithiasis procedures incorporating technical and nontechnical skills training for implementation across Europe. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An international panel of experts from EULIS, EUREP, ESU and ESUT was consulted in five stages. The study incorporated a mix of qualitative and quantitative data for collection and analysis. Responses were drawn out in (1) an opinion survey and (2) a curriculum development survey, which were discussed in (3) a focus group meeting. Group responses from this meeting were analysed for themes, which were discussed at (4) a focus group meeting, where consensus was reached among the group. Data analysis and integration at this stage were used to draft the curriculum. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All group meetings were transcribed from the focus group discussion. Eight themes were generated, into which all data were categorised. These were: need for a training curriculum; curriculum objectives; curriculum structure; curriculum content; teaching platforms and tools; assessment and certification; validation and implementation; and global integration of the curriculum. A curriculum, including recommended simulators for use, was subsequently proposed. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a comprehensive curriculum for training in urolithiasis. Additional planning is required for full validation and implementation before it can be used to train residents. PATIENT SUMMARY: Stone disease accounts for a major proportion of surgical interventions worldwide. We describe a consensus guideline for effective training of stone surgeons.